Archive for April, 2010

Winds shifting for Pickens’ wind farm plan

Saturday, April 17th, 2010

(Credit:
Martin LaMonica/CNET)

T. Boone Pickens speaks at the Clean-Tech Investor Summit in Palm Springs, California in January.

He called natural gas a “bridge” to renewable energy and electric vehicles because it’s available now and is 50 percent cleaner in terms of carbon emissions than gasoline and diesel.

He also said that a significant change in the last year is that U.S. politicians are now starting to take action on policies to reduce imports of oil.

T. Boone Pickens’ massive wind farm, planned for Texas, is looking for a new home.

On CNBC’s Squawk Box show Tuesday, he predicted that the price of oil will go from over $60 now to $75 by the end of the year.

“You had them standing in line to finance you when natural gas was $9 (per million BTUs)…Natural gas at $4 doesn’t have many people trying to finance you,” he told the Dallas newspaper (video). “I’m going to start receiving those turbines in the first quarter of ‘11 and I don’t have that big of a garage to put them in there so I got to start getting ready to use them.”

The energy tycoon and wind advocate told the Dallas Morning News that a project to install hundreds of wind turbines in the Texas panhandle will not work because of a lack of transmission lines. Instead, Pickens’ wind company is looking for other locations in the Midwest and possibly Texas.

“You can’t move an 18-wheeler on a battery. It won’t move. We have six and a half million trucks in America. I want to (convert) 100,000 a year on natural gas,” he said. In addition to wind, Pickens has invested in natural gas vehicle companies.

Pickens on Tuesday started a round of media interviews to commemorate the launch one year ago of the Pickens Plan, his proposal to invest massively in wind and natural gas vehicles to cut imports of oil. The campaign, financed by $58 million of Pickens’ money, has attracted millions of followers, and Pickens himself has spoken to lawmakers about energy policy.

“I don’t think the first place we build, though, is where we thought we would because we don’t have the transmission,” Pickens said in an interview done last week.

Pickens added that falling price of natural gas–now about $4 per million BTUs–is making it harder for his wind company, Mesa Power, to get the funds to build a wind farm. In 2008, Mesa Power announced it would purchase General Electric wind turbines capable of generating 1,000 megawatts worth of electricity.

Live blog Microsoft, Nokia ink mobile Office deal

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

8:29 a.m.
Not sure if its just me or everyone on the phone call. But my line just went silent.

Oistamo said that the deal is not really about the
iPhone.

8:15 a.m.
Of course Nokia and Microsoft do compete in some areas and will continue to do so, Elop said. Microsoft is committed to Windows Mobile, Elop said, while Oistamo said that Nokia remains committed to Symbian (despite some recent reports to the contrary).

“Should have been using a Nokia cell phone,” Elop recovered nicely.

I’m talking with some executives in a few minutes. If anyone has questions that didn’t get answered, shoot them my way. Ina (dot) Fried (at) CNET (dot) com.

8:23 a.m.
The version of Microsoft Office and other Microsoft software for Symbian will be tailored to those that make sense on their phones, Elop said. Oistamo said that the Microsoft software shouldn’t require more expensive hardware than Nokia was already planning on bringing to market.

8:18 a.m.
On to the Q&A portion. The first question is about Apple, naturally.

Nokia and Microsoft are both trying to improve their mobile position amid greater competition from the likes of Apple and Google.

Call ends.

Executives from both companies are about to discuss the deal on a conference call which will be covered live here.

“This is really about creating a formidable challenge for RIM rather than anyone else,” Oistamo said, referring to BlackBerry maker Research In Motion.

8:32 a.m.
Questioner asks why this shouldn’t be seen as a sign Windows Mobile won’t dominate the smartphone market. “There will continue to be competition around Windows Mobile,” Elop said. “By no means is it an acknowledgment of what you described.”

As first reported by CNET News on Tuesday, the partnership means that a mobile version of Office will show up on Nokia cell phones. In the past, the only phones with mobile versions of Office have been those running Microsoft’s Windows Mobile operating system.

8:34 a.m.
Elop clarifies that this deal relates to full mobile versions of Office–not Microsoft’s browser-based Web applications. And, it will include OneNote (in case anyone was wondering).

8:11 a.m. PT
“Work is already under way,” Microsoft’s Stephen Elop said, adding that the companies expect a mobile version of Microsoft’s Communicator product will be available for Symbian next year.

8:26 a.m.
Will Nokia make Windows Mobile phones? “There are no such plans,” Oistamo said.

8:12 a.m.
“We’re only starting to scratch the surface,” said Nokia Devices executive vice president
Kai Oistamo. “This is much more than putting
Microsoft Office on Nokia smartphones.” The companies are also working on bringing access to SharePoint and other of Microsoft’s tools to Symbian phones.

8:30 a.m.
Back now. Not very impressive to have a conference call drop from two leaders in telephony.

We both believe strongly in our respective strategies but we also believe in this partnership, Elop said. “One size does not fit all,” he added.

The two companies said they will start to work immediately to bring Office Mobile as well as Microsoft’s communications and device management software to Nokia’s devices based on the Symbian operating system. Although they hope to eventually get the software running on a range of devices, the partnership will start with Nokia’s business-oriented E-series of phones.

Microsoft and Nokia–still significant rivals in the cell phone business–said Wednesday that they are deepening their work together.

Nokia is also renewing its license to Microsoft’s ActiveSync technology as part of the deal.

How turf wars and miscues crippled SpiralFrog

Sunday, April 11th, 2010

Khan replied that Schrieberg was “CEO only in name. His duties are all gone to me.” But Khan stopped short of agreeing to remove Schrieberg. “We can’t have another CEO leave,” he wrote.

During the two years Schrieberg was CEO, the company hired the sons of board members Steve Norcia, Tom Mackell, and Bob Gordon. Schrieberg confirmed this but said the board member’s sons were well-qualified.

So why go that riskier route, borrowing money? Most companies that can attract venture capital do. Taking out loans is less attractive because loans typically have to be repaid with interest, regardless of how the company fares.

“At this time, the company is out of money, all employees have been terminated, (and) over $8 million of payables remain outstanding,” Stagg wrote. “There are multiple lawsuits with pending judgments, and the major music publishers, including Sony/ATV, Warner Chappell, and Harry Fox are expecting $550,000 of long overdue payments. Sony ATV is demanding a payment of $100,000 by Monday, December 15, which, if the company fails to meet, might force SpiralFrog to remove all of Sony ATV’s content from the site.”

In September, at about the time the economy was becoming unglued, Viacom backed out of investment talks, and SpiralFrog’s chances to survive the recession soured. One executive who did business with SpiralFrog and had seen the company’s books said it’s hard for him to conceive that anyone would have bought it. The source said the company’s debt was just too big and complicated.

Who is in charge?

Headquartered in New York, SpiralFrog was a different kind of start-up from the get-go. It funded operations through loans. The company issued secured notes, essentially a contract whereby a company promises to repay at a certain interest rate.

Click on the image above to see a full AOL invoice that led SpiralFrog’s board to strip CEO Mel Schrieberg of most of his authority.

“(Schrieberg) needs to be kept out of the office. When I saw the invoice today, I realized how serious this is…the majority of the board and senior (management) team find him incompetent…Make him vice chair, and pay him for his cooperation.”–SpiralFrog founder Joe Mohen in an e-mail about former CEO Mel Schrieberg

Another way SpiralFrog differed from most start-ups was that it spent lavishly on salaries. Start-up CEOs typically ask for more equity in their companies rather than a big paycheck. It’s common to see Silicon Valley managers earn less than $150,000 a year.

After receiving $9 million in traditional equity funding in 2006, Stagg’s investment firm began loaning SpiralFrog money in May 2007. Eventually, Stagg would lend the music service $34 million in convertible notes, which gave him the option of converting the loans into stock. Stagg said he never recouped the money.

As for how he got into financial trouble, Mohen suggested that it was because of SpiralFrog’s collapse. “I risked everything on the company,” he said, adding that he invested $400,000 of his personal wealth, an amount he says he never recovered.

Certainly, SpiralFrog, which was trying to succeed with an unproven business model, wasn’t exactly in an ideal position from the start. But former insiders, most of whom requested anonymity, say inexperienced managers who allowed petty squabbles to cloud their judgment didn’t do themselves or their company any favors.

Hiring relatives of board members can be problematic, according to corporate-governance experts. Employees can file discrimination suits, if they believe that a board member’s relative was given a promotion that rightfully should have gone to them. Schrieberg said all the hires were cleared by the company’s legal counsel. He also denied that such decisions made him unpopular with SpiralFrog employees. On the contrary, he said, “I was revered.”

Starting over

In an interview, Khan and Stagg said Schrieberg was kept around because of the ongoing Viacom negotiations. Stagg said he and the rest of the board believed that removing Schrieberg would have rattled the entertainment conglomerate, which had expressed interest in obtaining a minority stake in SpiralFrog. With Stagg’s blessing, Khan and some of his lieutenants at the hedge fund tried operating the start-up for several months without any official titles. In an interview, Mohen called this effort a disaster.

Could have been a contender

In December 2008, cash-strapped SpiralFrog appeared doomed. Entertainment conglomerate Viacom had expressed interest in acquiring a minority stake in the start-up three months beforehand, but the deal fell through. Yahoo would also eventually kick the tires on SpiralFrog but it also passed. Stagg, in a December 11, 2008, e-mail to SpiralFrog’s board, from which he had recently resigned, sized up SpiralFrog’s bleak financial situation.

On March 13, 2009, the music service was forced to turn over assets to creditors and shut down. To find out how a company that some called a potential iTunes killer so quickly turned into yet another dot-com flameout, CNET reviewed numerous documents and interviewed 13 people formerly associated with the company, including former board members, executives, and employees.

Click the image above to see copies of some of SpiralFrog's correspondence.

Schrieberg said Mohen asked him to be the guarantor of an American Express card that Mohen would use for business expenses. And since it was Stagg covering those expenses, he could deny any charge. That made Mohen beholden to Stagg as well as well as Schrieberg, who said he was never reimbursed for more than $40,000 that Mohen rung up on the credit card.

“I was revered.”–Former SpiralFrog CEO Mel Schrieberg

Schrieberg, a former IBM executive, had no operational experience in advertising or in music. In e-mails sent to several SpiralFrog employees, Mohen called some of Schrieberg’s decisions “insane.”

It was a questionable call. According to several former employees, to entice users of illegal peer-to-peer sites to SpiralFrog’s legal and free music service, the company needed a CEO with a strong background in advertising and music. Schrieberg, who spent most of his career as a sales manager at companies like Xerox and IBM, had neither.

But why would Schrieberg share his card with Mohen? Schrieberg said he was just trying to help him out. Several former employees said, however, that Schrieberg went to great lengths to ingratiate himself with board members, including Mohen.

Click the image above to read our story on how SpiralFrog's founder, Joe Mohen, enabled a former employee to sell customers' e-mails.

Power struggle

In early 2008, Schrieberg spearheaded a massive search engine- and affiliate-marketing campaign that would eventually cost the company $11 million, records show. The strategy was successful at drawing visitors but failed to generate lasting interest. Most people stayed a few minutes, viewed a few Web pages, and moved on. The practice of paying for traffic was supported by the board of directors and Mohen, but eventually, they lost faith in the strategy and in Schrieberg.

Until the economic meltdown, Mohen said SpiralFrog was on track. “It was all going to happen for us in October,” he said. “We came a lot closer than people will ever know.”

The start-up’s short, troubled history saw other clashes among managers. At the center of most of them was Mohen. He butted heads with his handpicked CEO, as well as SpiralFrog’s board of directors and financial backers.

What really killed SpiralFrog, according to Mohen and Schrieberg, 66, was the collapse of the investment-banking industry in September and the nation’s subsequent financial meltdown. “There is not much you can do when funding and advertising sales go down precipitously due to economic conditions,” Schrieberg said.

In mid-September, the wheels came off. Viacom declined to invest in SpiralFrog. Stagg continued to provide some funding, but only a small percentage of what he once did. In November, Mohen gathered employees still left and told them that the company would not make payroll.

Proof that Stagg and 3V did control SpiralFrog could potentially cost the investor more than he’s already lost over it. Antaeus Capital, a financial-services firm that began working with SpiralFrog in 2006, has asserted in a lawsuit that the start-up breached several agreements. The complaint, filed last November, alleges that SpiralFrog was really Stagg’s property and that he should make good on the money the company owed. The case is still moving through the courts.

Still, everyone knew that such an endeavor would be impossible, according to Stagg, because the licensing deals that SpiralFrog had with Universal Music and EMI were nontransferable. If SpiralFrog went bankrupt, Mohen would have to renegotiate for new music licenses.

Despite his significant consulting fees and the private sale of some of his SpiralFrog shares, Mohen took out a personal loan of $115,000 in 2007 from a financial-services firm that was doing business with SpiralFrog, records show. He acknowledged to CNET News that he has not yet repaid the loan.

“The management team to a person was alienated by Stagg’s people,” Mohen said. “That was because they tried to operate a business, and they didn’t have the skills to do it.”

Perhaps not surprisingly, by the summer of 2008, it was becoming apparent that Mohen, Schrieberg, and Stagg were competing for control of the privately held SpiralFrog, former employees say. SpiralFrog was dependent on Stagg’s money, which gave him considerable influence. Schrieberg had the board behind him at least until July. Mohen’s personal financial troubles and feuding with fellow board members, meanwhile, sapped much of his power.

“The management team…was alienated by Stagg’s people. That was because they tried to operate a business, and they didn’t have the skills to do it.”– Joe, Mohen, SpiralFrog founder

Stagg may have overstated the situation a bit. Money would eventually trickle back in–virtually all of it from him–to help the company limp along while the board searched for an acquirer. There’s no doubt, however, that at that time, SpiralFrog was nearing collapse.

To Mohen, SpiralFrog “was all about him controlling the company, no matter who was in charge,” Schrieberg, who maintained his CEO title from January 2007 to October 2008, told CNET News in a phone interview. But Mohen, who had founded the pioneering voting site Election.com, hardly deserves all the blame for what went wrong.

Although Mohen declined to specify how SpiralFrog’s prospects might have changed in October, records show that company executives believed that a Viacom investment, which to them seemed imminent, would save the start-up.

Mohen, 53, acknowledges that mistakes were made. But, he added, what else could you expect? SpiralFrog was breaking new ground as it attempted to become the first service to offer music downloads free of charge to the public. In his version of the company story, everyone did their best and came close to turning SpiralFrog into a hit service, which attracted more than 2.5 million register users before closing.

Schrieberg said he resigned of his own volition in October. But he acknowledged that Mohen came to him sometime around July 21 and told him that Khan would be taking over most of the CEO duties. He said he agreed to go along with the plan because Stagg and 3V were already calling most of the shots. But Schrieberg strongly maintains that he performed well at SpiralFrog and that the board and senior management were aware of “every penny” he spent as CEO.

In July 2008, two months before start-up SpiralFrog’s aspirations were shredded by the souring economy and a series of management gaffes, the long knives were already drawn in the music service’s executive suite.

The situation was tough, but there was a brief upside for Mohen: without Stagg’s money, SpiralFrog’s management no longer had to placate him, former employees said. Mohen was named interim CEO and began looking for new investors. He tried convincing 3V to continue funding the company by threatening to steer SpiralFrog into bankruptcy and start all over with a new company.

Adding to the management dysfunction was Scott Stagg, who managed 3V (now called Stagg Capital), the company that loaned SpiralFrog $34 million. For nearly two years, Stagg paid all of SpiralFrog’s bills. Only sumo wrestlers are more likely to throw their weight around than Stagg, former employees have indicated, and even Mohen says management couldn’t do much without first checking with Stagg.

The terms of drawn-up contracts, copies of which were obtained by CNET, called for Viacom to give SpiralFrog $100,000 in cash and $6.5 million worth of advertising on its MTV Networks unit. In exchange, Viacom would receive 4.3 million shares of preferred stock. The deal, if closed, would have valued SpiralFrog at about $120 million.

Stagg made several unsuccessful attempts to take control of the board but always failed. “The truth is, we never had control (of the company) because we never had control of the board,” Stagg said.

Nonetheless, Schrieberg lost the board’s backing on July 21, when a $974,000 invoice from AOL, for affiliate-marketing services, reached the desks of Mohen and other board members. The bill was a shock; Schrieberg had told the board that the costs add up to about $600,000, according to 3V’s Khan. In an e-mail exchange between Mohen and Khan, who was also a board member, Mohen lobbied for 3V to oust Schrieberg.

In a private meeting, CEO Mel Schrieberg was stripped of most of his power after SpiralFrog’s board grew tired of his heavy spending on salaries and ineffective marketing strategies. Even worse for Schrieberg, the man intent on driving him out was an old friend and one of his main allies at the company, founder Joe Mohen.

In the end, the current suit is a fight over the bones of a dead company. SpiralFrog’s domain name was sold in May to MyMojo, a mobile-content site, for $20,000, sources say. After three years’ worth of turf wars, more than $40 million worth of loans and investments, and a long list of unfulfilled promises, that’s pretty much all that was left.

“The board wants him removed now,” Mohen wrote in a July 21, 2008, e-mail exchange with Amir Khan, an executive at 3V Capital Management, SpiralFrog’s biggest financial backer. “He adds no value at this time. The management will be very demoralized, if he remains.”

“(Schrieberg) needs to be kept out of the office,” Mohen wrote. “When I saw the invoice today, I realized how serious this is…At this point, the majority of the board and senior-(management) team find him incompetent…Make him vice chair, and pay him for his cooperation.”

A power struggle between Kent and Mohen paved the way for Schrieberg’s appointment as CEO. In December 2006, Kent nearly drove Mohen out of SpiralFrog in a failed takeover bid. Mohen barely had enough board votes to keep control, and Kent, who had become CEO only seven months earlier, was sent packing. Just days after that, Mohen handed SpiralFrog’s CEO position to Schrieberg, whom he had known for 11 years, Schrieberg said.

Not at SpiralFrog, which paid Mohen $360,000 a year in annual “consulting fees,” documents show. Before he departed, former CEO Robin Kent was paid a $340,000 salary. Schrieberg’s salary was $279,000.

Twilight time for Yahoo search

Friday, April 9th, 2010

What will Microsoft keep, and what will it discard? It’s not just a question of technology: the lives of search engineers such as Davtchev could be changed if Microsoft kills their project in favor of its own. The company has promised to hire several hundred engineers, but Yahoo has “way more than that” many people working on search, Davtchev said, and when the three major search players condense into two, somebody’s going to get squeezed.

Following a Wednesday morning session on the SEO implications of duplicate content at Search Engine Strategies 2009, technical and marketing attendees crowded three deep around Google’s Greg Grothaus and Microsoft’s Sasi Parthasarathy, peppering them with questions about the best way to construct their Web sites. A smaller group, unable to get directly to Grothaus, clustered around the search expert seated directly to his left, Yahoo’s Ivan Davtchev.

Parthasarathy, speaking on behalf of Yahoo, dismissed the API discussion as rumors, probably without knowing that they were started by a colleague. But the news about the closing of the Yahoo Term Extraction API was noticed on a public Yahoo message board for search professionals, rather than surfacing as unsourced Internet scuttlebutt.

SAN JOSE, Calif.–Yahoo’s lame-duck period as a search company is in full swing.

The industry knows this process is being currently debated, and confusion can reign. Fellow panelists Shari Thurow of Omni Marketing Interactive and Marty Weintraub of AimClear urged Parthasarathy to save Yahoo’s Site Explorer “Site Explorer, to me, is one of the best tools to analyze content,” Thurow said. Weintraub brought up a conversation on Twitter Wednesday started by Microsoft’s Dare Obasanjo about Yahoo closing certain search APIs.

While that might be true regarding the public face of Yahoo search, it’s clear that a tectonic shift is taking place in the search industry. It’s hard to imagine that should the deal pass government scrutiny, Yahoo will be back for Search Engine Strategies 2010.

Bing is the trendy word in the search engine business right now, following Microsoft’s overhaul of the former Live Search service earlier this year and the generally positive reviews–and traffic–that have followed. However, despite what CEO Carol Bartz has claimed, Yahoo has a rich history in the search field and although it gave up its lead to Google long ago, has continued to advance the field with work on technologies such as semantic search.

This kind of confusion is understandable in the early days of any significant merger. It might take years for the Microsoft-Yahoo search deal to wind its way through lawyers and regulators. Indeed, Davtchev said, “for the next year, it should be business as usual” for Yahoo Search.

As Grothaus and Parthasarathy continued to field questions from all sides, Davtchev took a moment to reflect on the situation, noting that there is an awful lot that is still up in the air about Yahoo search. Right after the conclusion of the panel here at the San Jose Convention Center, Davtchev planned to get back on U.S. 101 and head a few miles north to Yahoo’s headquarters in Sunnyvale, Calif., for a series of meetings on how Microsoft and Yahoo will integrate each other’s search technologies.

It must be a tough time to be a Yahoo search engineer. Following the company’s decision two weeks ago to shutter its search business in a deal with Microsoft’s Bing, Yahoo has gone from a respected–if smaller–player in the business of constructing search engines, to an awkward participant in conferences such as these, where Bing representatives like Parthasarathy answer audience questions about the future of Yahoo search technologies.

Yahoo did not immediately return a call seeking comment on Term Extraction.

EU dives into Intel antitrust specifics

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Intel rebates to Lenovo during year 2007 “were conditioned on Lenovo purchasing its CPU needs for its notebook segment exclusively from Intel. For example, in a December 2006 e-mail, a Lenovo executive stated: ‘Late last week Lenovo cut a lucrative deal with Intel. As a result of this, we will not be introducing AMD based products in 2007 for our Notebook products’.”

Intel also issued a response Monday. “There is nothing new here. This Decision reflects the underlying bias we have come to expect from the case team that ran this investigation,” Intel said. “The Commission relied heavily on speculation found in e-mails from lower level employees that did not participate in the negotiation of the relevant agreements,” Intel said. “At the same time, they ignored or minimized hard evidence of what actually happened, including highly authoritative documents, written declarations and testimony given under oath by senior individuals who negotiated the transactions at issue.”

Today, the EC fired back. Some of Monday’s particulars from the EC press release include:

Intel rebates to HP from November 2002 to May 2005 were conditioned on HP purchasing no less than 95 percent of its CPU needs for business desktops from Intel (the remaining 5 percent that HP could purchase from AMD was then subject to further restrictive conditions set out below). In a submission to the Commission, HP stated that “Intel granted the credits subject to the following unwritten requirements: a) that HP should purchase at least 95% of its business desktop system from Intel …” An HP executive wrote: ‘PLEASE DO NOT… communicate to the regions, your team members or AMD that we are constrained to 5% AMD by pursuing the Intel agreement.’”

Intel continued: “Also, the Commission consistently construed ambiguous documents in a manner adverse to Intel, while overlooking or dismissing authoritative documents as ‘insufficiently clear’ when they contradicted the Commission’s case. This pattern occurred across the board with respect to documents and statements submitted not only by Intel but also by third parties. The result was that the Commission dismissed or ignored extensive exculpatory evidence.”

The EC also cited “Naked Restrictions” such as: “Intel payments to Acer were conditioned on Acer postponing the launch of an AMD-based notebook from September 2003 to January 2004. For example, in a September 2003 email, an Intel executive reported: “good news just came from [Acer Senior Executive] that Acer decides to drop AMD K8 [notebook product] throughout 2003 around the world…They keep pushing back until today, after the call with [Intel executive] this morning, [Acer Senior Executive] just confirmed that they decide to drop AMD K8 throughout 2003 around the world. [Acer Senior Executive] has got this direction from [Acer Senior Executive] as well and will follow through in EMEA [Europe Middle East and Africa region]“.

Intel appealed the decision in July to a European court, saying that “evidence was ignored or misinterpreted.”

The European Commission Monday published a “non-confidential version” of its May 13 decision against Intel, which imposed a fine of $1.45 billion against the chip giant. That decision found that Intel broke EC Treaty antitrust rules (Article 82) by engaging in illegal practices to exclude competitors from the market for “x86″ central processing units (CPUs).

European antitrust regulators on Monday published internal e-mails that detail alleged antitrust behavior by Intel.

The EC action was based on complaints from Intel’s chief rival, Advanced Micro Devices.

Intel rebates to Dell from December 2002 to December 2005 were conditioned on Dell purchasing CPUs exclusively from Intel. For example, in an internal Dell presentation of February 2003, Dell noted that should Dell switch any part of its CPU supplies from Intel to its competitor AMD, Intel retaliation “could be severe and prolonged with impact to all LOBs [Lines of Business].”

AMD was quick to chime in with a comment Monday. “This is the first time that Intel has had to confront now publicly available facts of its illegal behavior and it won’t be the last. The U.S. FTC and New York Attorney General’s continuing investigations and AMD’s civil case against Intel will provide other clear demonstrations of Intel breaking the law, and we remain confident that we will win our U.S. civil case against Intel, which goes to trial in March,” AMD said.

McAfee seeks gag on exec ousted over options

Monday, April 5th, 2010

Fletcher could not comment on the arbitration award because a Texas state court had agreed to a McAfee request to put it under temporary seal. Depending on what happens in Monday’s hearing before Judge Carlos Cortez in the 44th District Court in Dallas, the information may stay confidential indefinitely.

At the time, Weiss had been McAfee president only for seven months, having been promoted to the post from executive vice president of worldwide sales and services in March 2006. Prior to joining McAfee, the Princeton University graduate had held senior positions at Ariba, BindView, and BMC Software.

“If an executive is terminated, how does he get his reputation back? Is it even possible to do that?” Weiss’ attorney, Scott Fletcher, asked rhetorically in a phone interview on Friday.

(Credit:
Author Solutions)

Following the arbitrator’s ruling, Weiss filed paperwork in the Texas court on June 16, seeking to have the award confirmed judicially. McAfee then filed documents asking the court to seal the records relating to the arbitration, and Weiss responded.

In what could be its final public word on the case, McAfee’s latest quarterly filing with the SEC two weeks ago states, “In January 2007, a former executive filed an arbitration demand with the American Arbitration Association, Dallas, Texas, seeking arbitration of claims associated with his employment. McAfee filed counterclaims. The arbitration took place in March 2009, and the matter was closed in June 2009.”

The amount of the damages awarded was not disclosed in that document, but a footnote says McAfee withheld “several million dollars” from the payment, designating it as ordinary income for tax purposes, which provides some sense of the size of the award.

On June 1, the arbitrator ruled in favor of Weiss on his claims for breach of contract and breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing, according to a motion Weiss filed in the Texas court in response to McAfee’s request to seal the arbitration order. The arbitrator found that Weiss had had no part in the stock option-granting process and that he had been improperly fired, and awarded him substantial damages, the document states.

Former McAfee President Kevin Weiss

A McAfee representative did not return a call seeking comment. Weiss, who is now president and chief executive of self-publishing firm Author Solutions, could not be reached for comment.

On October 11, 2006, Mcfee announced that it had ousted Weiss and that CEO George Samenuk had resigned in a management shake-up attributed to an internal investigation into the stock option backdating.

The arbitrator never ordered that the award be confidential, and Weiss did not agree to keep it confidential, the filing states.

As a result of the stock option practices, McAfee had to restate its earnings and was subject to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation. McAfee was just one of a number of firms that found itself in the predicament involving the practice of granting an employee stock options with a date prior to the date it was actually granted.

McAfee claims that the arbitration proceedings were confidential. Fletcher disputes that.

Former McAfee President Kevin Weiss, exonerated of wrongdoing in a stock option-backdating scandal, plans to ask a judge on Monday to unseal the arbitration award that cleared him of wrongdoing and ordered McAfee to pay damages for firing him without proper cause.

In addition, McAfee has not shown a compelling need for keeping the award secret, the document claims.

Three years after being unceremoniously ousted from McAfee amid the options mess that was sweeping through corporations at the time, Weiss is attempting to clear his name in public.

In January 2007, Weiss filed claims in arbitration for breach of his employment contract. Separately, he filed an action for defamation and breach of his stock option agreements against McAfee in Santa Clara District Court in September 2007. Those court claims were folded into the arbitration.

“McAfee’s request is merely the last in a long series of attempts to undermine Mr. Weiss’ credibility and tarnish his reputation,” the court document filed on behalf of Weiss said. “Confirmation of the award provides a means to clear Mr. Weiss’ name publicly–something McAfee is apparently unwilling to do.”

BioSolar marks its biomass turf with patent app

Sunday, April 4th, 2010

The company is also trying to make it easy for interested solar manufacturers to make the switch from petroleum-based components. BioSolar’s rolls of biomass backsheets can be used with existing industrial machines, according to the company.

BioSolar’s BioBacksheet-A, a new addition to the company’s line of backsheets, consists of a sheet of aluminum foil sandwiched between two layers of polymer made from renewable plant sources. The aluminum used in the sheets is also 100 percent recyclable.

“BioSolar’s goal is to reduce the costs of solar modules and make solar energy greener by replacing petroleum-based module components with bio-based materials made from renewable plant sources,” David Lee, CEO of BioSolar, said in a statement.

The BioBacksheet-A can meet the requirement of thin-film photovoltaics “to have a water vapor transmissions rate of nearly zero,” according to BioSolar.

(Credit:
BioSolar)

The company announced that it was developing plant-based plastics for solar-cell components, which included the use of cotton and castor beans, in August 2008.

BioSolar has filed a patent application for a new type of backing for photovoltaic cells.

A backsheet is the bottom layer of a photovoltaic cell used by solar manufacturers to protect the cell from moisture, temperature fluctuations, and the elements.

BioSolar's biomass backsheets for solar cells will work with existing industrial manufacturing machines.

Google gets what Mozilla wants a Sony preinstall

Sunday, April 4th, 2010

That’s hardly something to cheer about, given the small share of Linux in mobile personal computers.

However, Sony has now given Google’s Chrome browser something that Mozilla has struggled to obtain: a preinstall deal. As CNET reports, Google Chrome is being installed on Windows PCs alongside IE, with other distribution deals likely.

Google Chrome still accounts for less than 3 percent of the global browser market, but it has something that even Firefox can’t match: a dominant, global consumer brand. Google Chrome isn’t interesting to Sony because of its market share in Web browsers, but rather because of its overall consumer brand coupled with steady innovation in browsers.

At the same time, this move may open the door for Mozilla to snag its own preinstall deal(s) with competitors to Sony, who will also likely want to buy into Google’s brand but may prefer the Firefox option, given its wider adoption. Firefox users have been pressuring major hardware vendors to preinstall Firefox for years, but the best Mozilla has done is to get Firefox preinstalled with Linux-based notebooks and Netbooks.

This Google Chrome preinstall leaves an opening for Mozilla, but to capitalize on it Mozilla must improve its message. It has recently been claiming that we’re hitting a “seat-belt moment” in which browser security could lead to consumers flocking to Firefox. But it’s hard to get excited about browser security, no matter how important it is.

Back to Sony. Its open-source credentials have been called into question due to its rootkit debacle and decision to restrict Linux on the PlayStation 3, but this new decision to preinstall Chrome should redeem it with the open-source community and give Sony a ready-made marketing machine.

Much more interesting are Mozilla’s plans to update its browser to 4.0 by the end of 2010 and to release Fennec, its mobile browser, before the end of 2009, according to TG Daily. Extending Firefox to my mobile device? That is something consumers can get excited about which, in turn, should stir up interest from hardware vendors that are looking to bridge their smartphone and laptop strategies.

Finally, a clear choice for consumers.

Intriguingly, this Chrome deal opens up the possibility that Sony, as well as other computer manufacturers, will eventually sign on to ship Google Chrome OS, Google’s Netbook-optimized Linux operating system.

Follow me on Twitter @mjasay

Mozilla’s Firefox has maintained its steady ascent against Microsoft’s Internet Explorer in the global browser market, hitting 22.98 percent vs. IE’s 66.97 percent.

commentary

The browser market, already competitive, just became even more so. Google is at the top of its game right now, but so is Mozilla. Microsoft, for its part, is reportedly holding meetings in D.C. that some Beltway insiders have dubbed as “screw Google” gatherings. But Microsoft probably should be spending more time developing innovative browser solutions to compete with Google and Mozilla.

Microsoft Breaking up with IE 6 hard to do

Sunday, April 4th, 2010

“I think this is the right way to go and I think this can be practical,” Wang said. “It will also take a lot of work.”

Even with that work, though, IE 6 remains not only the most widely thought of version of Internet Explorer, but also the most widely used version of the browser, at least by a narrow margin. According to Net Applications, IE 6 accounts for 27 percent of the browser market, compared to 23 percent for IE 7. Microsoft’s new
IE 8 has more than 12 percent of the market, while
Firefox 3.0–the most widely used version of that product–has 16 percent (See chart below).

In large part, that’s because many of Internet Explorer’s users are the ones who tend not to change the browser that comes with their operating system–either because that’s the type of consumer they are, or because they are working on a work machine in which they are not able to upgrade to a later version of IE or switch to another browser.

While in many ways, Microsoft would like that too, it is a bit of a double edged sword, since some number of IE 6 users might consider a rival if they were to switch browsers at all.

In large part, the shifting nature of the browser is what led Google to develop its Chrome browser, and now its Chrome OS, which posits that most computing tasks these days can be done from within the browser.

Microsoft is also at least exploring the possibility that the browser might need a more significant overhaul. Its research unit has a prototype called Gazelle. In an exclusive interview last month, researcher Helen Wang told CNET News that browsers need to act more like an operating system, taking a greater role in determining which Web processes get priority in accessing a computer’s resources.

It’s been roughly eight years since Microsoft released Internet Explorer 6, but in many ways the company is still very much tied to the aging product.

(Credit:
Net Applications)

There, IE’s fate is tied largely to broader patterns of Windows adoption. Barzdukas said most businesses won’t move to a new version of IE unless they move to a new version of Windows that has a newer browser built in. So as many corporations have stuck with Windows XP, so too have they stuck with IE 6.

But Microsoft officials insist they simply can’t end support for IE 6, since it shipped as part of Windows XP and Microsoft has pledged to business customers that it will support that operating system–and its components–for some years to come.

A growing chorus of Internet users have asked Microsoft why, if it really wants people to move to IE 7 or IE 8, it doesn’t just end support for IE 6. After all, there have been plenty of calls for the death of IE 6, particularly from Web developers, who are weary of the work required to make their sites work in multiple versions of Internet Explorer, as well as
Safari, Firefox, and other browsers.

Beyond the question of adoption of later versions, there is also the question of whether IE doesn’t need an even more radical facelift, particularly in the era where the browser is used as an engine to run applications as much as it is a tool to move from Web site to Web site.

“As is the case with much work (Microsoft Research) does…they are often pushing us to think in new ways, which is part the reason we have them around.”

“Many PCs don’t belong to individual enthusiasts, but to organizations,” Internet Explorer chief Dean Hachamovitch said in a blog posting this week. “The people in these organizations responsible for these machines decide what to do with them. These people are professionally responsible for keeping tens or hundreds or thousands of PCs working on budget.”

For her part, Barzdukas was mum on where Microsoft is headed with Internet Explorer 9 and beyond.

Amy Barzdukas, the general manager for Internet Explorer, said in an interview this week that Microsoft’s perception is “being built by a browser that was fine technology eight years ago or a decade ago.”

Overall, Microsoft has been losing ground for several years to Firefox and other browsers. After reaching near ubiquity in the post-Netscape era, IE’s global market share is now less than 70 percent. However, Barzdukas is hopeful that the trend is starting to shift with the release of IE 8.

For many, Internet Explorer 6, is still the face of Microsoft's browser, even though the product has been updated twice in recent years.

But that’s frustrating, particularly since Microsoft has invested a fair amount of effort in the last couple of years trying to rebuild IE after letting it languish for several years. Microsoft added things like tabbed browsing and a phishing filter back with Internet Explorer 7, which debuted in October 2006, and earlier this year launched Internet Explorer 8, with anti-malware features as well as a private browsing option and improved standards support.

Although Microsoft has released two major versions of Internet Explorer in the past couple of years, for many, the face of Internet Explorer is still IE 6 in all its tabless glory.

One of the biggest things that could help Microsoft, Barzdukas said, is if more people understood that there were better browser options available from Microsoft. She has taken part of that task upon herself, making a pest of herself when she is at friends’ houses for dinner–checking to see what version of the browser they are using.

“To the extent that IE was losing share over the winter, any rate of loss has substantially slowed since we came out with IE 8, and in some geographies IE overall has actually gained significant share,” Barzdukas said.

Docstoc opens up a shop for publishers

Sunday, April 4th, 2010

As for payments, Docstoc is letting users pay via PayPal, Google Checkout, or with a credit card. There’s also a money-back guarantee policy that lets users get a refund if they’re dissatisfied. The policy gives users a week to make a return, with up to five returns a year. To keep any abuse from happening, the company is also tracking users’ IP addresses, to make sure they’re not just opening up new accounts and making returns beyond the five-time limit, although Docstoc CEO Jason Nazar told me he doesn’t anticipate too heavy a return rate, since the new viewer shows a multipage preview.

Online document host Docstoc on Wednesday is opening up an online store for publishers to sell their wares. The company is acting both as the host and the payment platform, as well as providing the viewing technology for the documents.

As part of the deal, publishers get “a majority” of the revenue, although actual figures are based on a sliding scale and depend on who they are and how Docstoc is promoting them.

Competitor Scribd launched a similar offering back in May with a guaranteed 80 percent revenue share to publishers and pricing limits up to $5,000 per title. Docstoc is launching with its aforementioned sliding scale of revenue sharing, which I’m told has no limit on maximum pricing. It will also continue to offer its advertising service, which places Google Adsense ads next to documents that are offered for free.

Browsing documents for sale is just like browsing Docstoc's free, hosted documents, except that you can only view a preview until you pay for a content license.

In order to avoid serving up two versions of a paid document, such as a preview and full version, Docstoc has updated its Adobe Flash-based viewer to limit viewing to several pages of a document. This lets potential buyers take a look before they buy, just as Amazon and competitor Scribd do.

(Credit:
Docstoc)

Documents purchased through Docstoc can be viewed on the Web or on portable devices like the Kindle and the
iPhone. Rather than selling books, Docstoc is specializing in ready-made forms, presentations, and technical documents–what the company is calling “professional utility documents.” However, there are some publishers in Docstoc’s store, like WriteMyEssay.com, that cover topics outside of business. Nazar says that the store may continue to expand into other areas, but that it will keep “selectively picking the best, high-quality partners” from those that apply to be included in the store.

Site Link:Cheap Dresses ghd timberland boots Cheap Timberland Boots NBA Jerseys Cheap Nike Shoes timberland boots lacoste designer handbags timberland shoes Bose Headphonesshopping.